![]() Differences between subjective interview data and objective eye-movement data underline the importance of combining different methods in usability testing.Īn e-book (electronic book) is an electronic version of a printed book.For people with visual impairment, e-readers have the advantage of providing an opportunity to adjust the font size.The legibility of the current e-reader generation is good e-ink technology enables a reading process that is very similar to the reading process for classic paper books.This problem illustrates a challenge for future e-reader development more functions should be integrated in such a way that they are usable intuitively. Another reason is that users expect more functions from an electronic reading device.One of the primary reasons for this is poor usability.E-readers are not yet accepted as a replacement for a classic paper book.The following list summarized take-aways that practitioners can get from this article: Interestingly, we found dissociations between objective eye-tracking data and subjective user data, stressing the importance of multi-method approaches. We found significant differences between the different brands of e-book readers. Users were unable to use e-readers intuitively and without problems. However, our study also showed that the current e-reader generation has large deficits with respect to usability. The results suggested that e-readers with e-ink technology provided legibility that was comparable to classic paper books. We tested five electronic reading devices and one classic paper book. Within the framework of a multifunctional approach, we combined eye tracking with other usability testing methods. ![]() In our study, we investigated these two requirements of e-reader design. An e-reader should meet two important requirements: adequate legibility and good usability. ![]() The use of e-book readers (e-readers or electronic-readers) has become increasingly widespread. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |